One of
the main aspirations a lot of people apparently have today is to become famous.
Sometimes they’re not even sure what they would like to be famous for just that
they covet the idea of celebrity and it’s no wonder. We celebrate celebrity like
never before but it is a double edged sword for those we deem to have reached
that plateau. Yes you can become famous for not very much these days but if you
put one step
out of line, if you Tweet something controversial or even worse do something
controversial you will find your platform of celebrity whisked from underneath
you by a welter of public outrage. That coupled with people’s generally lower
attention span and desire
for new things means that for many celebs- especially those without any
discernible talent other than their personality- the journey is swift, the rise
meteoric, the fall brutal.
The 2017 I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here stars: Does anyone know them all though? |
What
has also changed in the past couple of decades is that there are now lots of
different levels of celebrity and very few people are across them all. It used to be the case that there were famous
people and then there was everyone else and if a cross section of people had
not heard of you then you weren’t famous. Simple really. Now with multiple
platforms from which people can command attention you can find a vlogger with
views of 16 million which is more people than watch any TV programme so in a
way they are more popular than any TV star you might mention. Yet their
audience is largely young so Mrs Putey from number 7 will have no clue who this
person is. Equally those people will not have heard of someone whose celebrity
peaked 20 years back but who still have a following.
So when there’s a list of celebs taking part in a show like I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here, Celebrity Masterchef, Celebrity Big Brother etc there is always an outcry from various quarters yelling “How can you call Amber Goodchild a celebrity- all she does is make videos of dancing cakes!” Whereas others will think it is “sick” that Amber is on the show and they’ll vote for her rather than for ageing actor Edward Peppercorn whom they have never heard of but who used to be one of the small screen’s biggest stars.
As a society we are more interested in celebrity than ever before. Those who do not aspire towards it see themselves as moral judges of how celebrities behave. They demand the sort of rigorous lifestyle that they themselves may well fall short of but celebs must never, ever say a word, tweet or character out of place.
So when there’s a list of celebs taking part in a show like I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here, Celebrity Masterchef, Celebrity Big Brother etc there is always an outcry from various quarters yelling “How can you call Amber Goodchild a celebrity- all she does is make videos of dancing cakes!” Whereas others will think it is “sick” that Amber is on the show and they’ll vote for her rather than for ageing actor Edward Peppercorn whom they have never heard of but who used to be one of the small screen’s biggest stars.
As a society we are more interested in celebrity than ever before. Those who do not aspire towards it see themselves as moral judges of how celebrities behave. They demand the sort of rigorous lifestyle that they themselves may well fall short of but celebs must never, ever say a word, tweet or character out of place.
Course, it is logical that we demand standards from
politicians and decision makers whose job is to shape our laws yet why do we
demand them of soap stars or reality stars? Surely part of their particular appeal is that they are “just like us”?
So why won’t we accept them behaving just like us? You
might imagine that online culture and in particular social media would have
lessened the impact of celebrity as it makes celebs less distant or other worldly. However it doesn’t seem to
have done so. Do Tweeting celebs make them somehow more appealing?
Recently several younger celebrities have
had old Tweets dug up from years back causing a backlash. All of us probably
have things we did or said when young that we would never repeat now but the
difference is that for anyone over about 30, these are lost in time, if they
were made online they are not even if deleted by the user. As a society- and
especially as an online community- we are now too ready to judge these old
statements and then apply them to the now twentysomething person who made them years
back. However most people change a lot in those 10 years from mid teens to mid
20s.
Also such unacceptable views and
comments do not grow in a vacuum - they are overheard and some children grow up
believing it is acceptable and may not even know the full implications of the
words they are using. Without going into
detail I can remember in the 70s and 80s there were certain terms that would be
deemed offensive now but which everyone used then; from kids to pensioners!
Nowadays we have learned that they are wrong but these matters evolve over
time. So I resent those holier than though types who moralise about old
comments relating them to the present day and their own lives as if they are
somehow perfect themselves. One of the attributes once claimed about online fame was that it would be somehow different to regular fame and the appeal of reality shows was that the people in them were supposed to be easily identifiable to us. In the end though these people from relatively new celebrity areas end up converging down the same path as everyone else- books, tv shows, reality shows. There is no sign of our obsession with celebrity fading though despite all the setbacks and scandals that sink so many of them. Perhaps that’s because we know that as soon as one celebrity falls there will be someone else to take their place.
No comments:
Post a Comment