The most lowkey
takeover in recent retail history
The deal slipped
through when news was busy so didn’t even make the main headlines. The story
revealed just how much the company relied on its travel retail stores in
airports and railways stations which comprise 75% of its revenue and 85% of its
profits. The rest of the business- the high street operation - was sold to
Modella Capital on 30 June though the original value of £76 million was reduced
to £40 million and as part of the deal the name of these stores would need to
be changed so the moniker TG Jones was chosen.
The new owners have so
far made no attempt to initiate a radical makeover or establish a new identity for
the stores, surely the first act of a change of owner and name? They haven’t
even tried to pretend there was a real TG Jones to give the change some
interesting aspect. Remember when the makers of Mr Kipling cakes made us think
for decades there really was a Mr Kipling, an avuncular character who made all
the exceedingly good cakes himself? No such character here, the new name was
selected because they thought it seemed similar to that of WH Smith. Even
though “Smiths” rolls off the tongue a little easier than “Joneses”. I expect
over time- if it has a lot of time- people will start calling it TGs.
Of course there was a
real WH Smith. William Henry Smith, born on 24 June 1825, by an unfortunate
coincidence two hundred years to the month before the sale took place. He
expanded the family booksellers initially to railway stations which I suppose
lines up with where they have now retreated back to. He later became an MP and
First Lord of the Admiralty despite never having been in the Navy and is
believed to have inspired a character from HMS Pinafore. Thomas Gerard Jones could be a juggler and tap dancer who lives in Northampton. Or the inventor of the food mixer. I mean would it have been
too much to have invented someone to front the brand? Better still to have come
up with a name that reflects more modern times like The Everything Shop. If
they’d wanted to be cheeky they could have called themselves Booksmiths. TG
Jones just makes the shop instantly less interesting as it takes away the
legacy name yet doesn’t refresh the brand at all.
All of the issues they were having when called
WH Smith are still there so to make it work Modella need to do something other
than alter the name. Are there areas they could move into? What parts of the
business could be expanded? At present while they stock books they don’t have
enough to seriously compete with Waterstones. The current offer replicates the
travel shops which specialise in impulse purchases whereas people go into a
proper bookshop to browse. The new owners need to differentiate from those travel
shops to focus on the customers they do have and could add.
For decades Smiths was
more than just a shop, it became a focal point of the city centre. Countless
times people would meet “at Smiths” or “outside Smiths” and in the case of the
latter would almost always then go into the shop. The Smiths we had in the city
centre at its peak was expansive. A long row of magazines down one wall,
stationary galore on the other side of the shop. At the back a record shop the
size of, well, a record shop selling
CDs, videos, later DVDs and assorted headphones etc. Downstairs a vast bookshop
the same dimensions as your average Waterstones. They even sold sweets and
canned drinks. It was a place you might spend some time, a place for slow or
rainy days. This sounds like an odd thing to say about a large city but it was
a cornerstone of the community. Other retailers would come and go but Smiths
was always there.
The contraction began when the floor fell out
of the physical media market. The record shop shrank to some shelves and then
vanished altogether. The confectionary offer increased but then they moved to a
smaller premises into which a post office was also incorporated. Many people
stopped going in, even those who did found a diminishing range of items as
magazines went into decline and for some reason Smiths decided not to try and
compete with Waterstones, reducing their book offer when it was their most viable
source of income. Latterly they bought an already failed company, Toys R Us
into stores robbing their own area of even more space yet the rent was
presumably vital for survival. Plus, kids can get a photo next to a giraffe. I
suppose anyone can if they choose. Once a photo opportunity with an inflatable animal
is a shop’s key draw then something is wrong.
As yet it’s not clear
how TG Jones can add anything that will sustain the business long term. The
initial policy of continuity can’t last too long; sooner or later they will
need to stamp their own identity and try some new things. Currently nearly
everything they sell is what are now called legacy products and its difficult to
see what up and coming things they could add to increase footfall. They are
being squeezed both by online alternatives and stores like B&M in terms of
what USP they can bring to the high street and how they can undercut rival’s
prices. If it feels like a mountain to climb, they could look at HMV another
shop whose days appeared numbered ten years ago but who have rallied to take
advantage of being the only retailer left standing in their field. There is
evidence suggesting that far from wanting to do everything online, even younger
people are sometimes turning back to physical products and IRL shopping as a
lifestyle choice which a shop like TGs could take advantage of. See - I’m already
calling it TGs.




No comments:
Post a Comment