The venerable music publication NME is about to become a free publication given away like Metro or London’s Standard for nothing. This is surely just a temporary situation paving the way for the brand to move totally online. As someone who has spent a lot of time writing and editing print fanzines there is part of me that finds this trend disappointing (says he typing on a blog!). However you can see it’s inevitability. Most people now obtain news online where it can be updated every few seconds and is obviously more up to date than waiting for even the quickest print process. Anything else can be put somewhere for all to see whether it’s Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube or wherever. All of which means the concept of a formal, edited entity is slowly dying out.
In the
case of NME it sensibly stopped focussing on news in its magazine ages ago
leaving that to the website. When you stop and consider it makes sense for
everything to be on there; they can still have reviews of gigs and new music
only you can include clips of them as well. Then again will this gradually
diminish the art of reviewing? If you can watch or listen to something then you
make up your own mind about it; why bother to read someone else’s opinion
however informed it might be? I have to say though that people do still pay
heed to reviews. Even nowadays a buzz can be created by some positive reviews.
The wider issue as far as NME is concerned is the way that music has become more of an establishment thing nowadays. Once in a while someone comes along attempting to be outrageous but because of the way 24 hour media works people tire of such antics far more quickly and usually the music is not there to back up the image.
The wider issue as far as NME is concerned is the way that music has become more of an establishment thing nowadays. Once in a while someone comes along attempting to be outrageous but because of the way 24 hour media works people tire of such antics far more quickly and usually the music is not there to back up the image.
People
also tend to listen to music while doing something else which is not how it
used to be. There was a time when music fans would sit and listen to a new
album to the exclusion of anything else soaking up every note whilst reading
the lyrics. This doesn’t happen much anymore so we pay less attention to the
music we listen to. Case in point- as I type this I have some music on in the
background but I’m not really listening to it properly.
Also while some teenagers are still influenced by particular music genres it doesn’t seem to have the same widescreen importance to their lives as it did. In decades gone, young people’s lifestyle was dominated by music whether it was teenage girls (the famed `screamagers`) following a pop group or indie kids following bands round the country (not literally all the time) and dressing like them. Such things now seem to be part of a wider landscape but no longer the defining theme of teenage life.
Also while some teenagers are still influenced by particular music genres it doesn’t seem to have the same widescreen importance to their lives as it did. In decades gone, young people’s lifestyle was dominated by music whether it was teenage girls (the famed `screamagers`) following a pop group or indie kids following bands round the country (not literally all the time) and dressing like them. Such things now seem to be part of a wider landscape but no longer the defining theme of teenage life.
Music
papers were a part of all that of course which is why their influence was
waning before the decline of print media. There was a time when a handful of
journalists could bunch a cadre of similar artists together and sell a concept
to young readers. True, many of these never made it beyond the confines of
those readers but notable musical landmarks like punk, New Wave or grunge might
never have gained such international traction without the music press to propel
them.
NME only survived this far as a brand because it proved surprisingly adaptable. It was there at the start championing beat groups in the 1960s, had its most influential period as an indie alternative to the pop mags and rock mags in the 70s and 80s and more recently adapted to the iTunes generation who like “all kinds of music”.
NME only survived this far as a brand because it proved surprisingly adaptable. It was there at the start championing beat groups in the 1960s, had its most influential period as an indie alternative to the pop mags and rock mags in the 70s and 80s and more recently adapted to the iTunes generation who like “all kinds of music”.
Now music
is one big thing available through all kinds of channels and it has drained the
NME of relevance. The fact that lately the paper has featured exactly the same
acts as you might see on the cover of Mojo or inside The Guardian has probably
not helped to distinguish it from the others.
On a
personal note it was music journalism that first inspired me to write stuff
albeit on non music subjects and I do miss the personality led writing that
built the music press’ greatest days. Yet in the Selfie Age where the opinions
people value above all others are their own there is no place for the likes of
NME. Even so you have to commend the fact that it’s still knocking about.
No comments:
Post a Comment