BBC One 7.30pm Saturday 30th
August 2014
written by Phil Ford and Steven Moffatt / starring Peter Capaldi, Jenna Coleman, Zawe Ashton, Michael Smiley, Nicholas Briggs, Samuel Anderson
written by Phil Ford and Steven Moffatt / starring Peter Capaldi, Jenna Coleman, Zawe Ashton, Michael Smiley, Nicholas Briggs, Samuel Anderson
Reviewed by Sean Alexander
The
Doctor and the Daleks. Fifty years and
seemingly countless stories later and still the two seem inseparable, both in
the mind-set of the general public and narratively speaking at the core of
‘Doctor Who’s raison d’etre. In the post Time War universe of the 21st
Century show the stakes between Doctor and Dalek have been raised as high as
the bar can seemingly go; and the trick of every fresh Dalek story remains the
same: how can you keep Time Lord and nemesis at each others’ throats without
the risk of apathetic overkill?
WARNING- SPOILERS PAST THIS POINT
The
answer perhaps lies inside, which is fortunate as this decades long antagonism
has always been most intriguing when stripped down to the core. The Doctor and the Daleks is one of modern
pop culture’s most resonant rivalries: the constant wanderer and champion of
the oppressed against the ultimate symbol of dehumanised moral vacuity. It’s a morality tale of this and any time:
the immovable object of technological purity versus the irresistible force of
human endeavour. If ‘Doctor Who’ was
ever a metaphor for post-industrial hybridization, then the Doctor and the
Daleks have always been its purest expression.
But any
great rivalry has at its heart a mutual respect, and even similarity. Into the Dalek may put the Doctor inside ‘the
most dangerous place in the universe’, but the battle within is more about the
moral ambiguity of a man who kills in the name of peace and a monster who kills
in the name of purity. Phil Ford’s
second script for Who (again with the show’s current head honcho tacked on as
joint credit) is a fast-paced action/adventure that for 45 minutes manages to
pose the kind of moral and philosophical questions that ‘Doctor Who’ does at
its best. Given the chance to see a
Dalek,figuratively, from the inside out Ford asks the kind of questions he
first posed in The Waters of Mars:
can established facts be rewritten, and what price is to be paid by the
success?
And
almost as a side event we are introduced to former soldier, now Coal Hill
teacher, Danny Pink, a seemingly traumatised veteran whose past you suspect
will come back to haunt him. It’s a nice
turn by newcomer Samuel Anderson, largely underplayed if you ignore the single
tear, and promising much given the prospect of a burgeoning dalliance with a
Clara recently relieved of the pretty young man in her life. How Danny will fit in as the plus-one in the
new TARDIS triumvirate remains to be seen, but his soldier background may well
be an interesting vein to be bled given the new Doctor’s already expressed
animosity to goons with guns.
But Into the Dalek succeeds most by not recalling the kind of sci-fi tropes
that inevitably dogged its premise of shrunken Doctor and co. injected into a
radiation ravaged and morally questioned foe.
This may be the one ultimately known as ‘Honey, I Shrunk the Doctor’,
but fortunately we are largely relieved of much of the expected homages to the
likes of Fantastic Voyage, Innerspace and a dozen other examples of
miniaturised mayhem. The episode’s pace
helps, as little time is spent on pregnant pauses to allow the viewer to step
out of the premise and be reminded of past glories – the show’s own Planet of
Giants and The Invisible Enemy no doubt being on the tip of every old school
fan’s tongues. And instead the ‘morality
as malfunction’ plot device allows the kind of moral complexity that it seems
Series Eight is more than happy to examine given a more morally dubious Doctor
and a seemingly steadfast desire to go ‘Into Darkness’, both literally and
figuratively.
Whether
this all pays off somewhere down the line remains to be seen. With a Dalek now enlightened by the wonders
of the universe, plus a heavy dose of the Doctor’s own dark and occasionally
demented hatred of its species, it’s tempting to suggest that some kind of
wholesale reappraising of the series’ oldest and most durable monsters is in
the pipeline. But if this was ‘I, Dalek’
in a similar way to ‘Star Trek: The Next
Generation’s flawed attempt to reboot the Borg with a single, thinking
soldier then it’s to be hoped that any diminishing of the Dalek threat is not
at the cost of reducing ‘Doctor Who’s most successful example of monster as
metaphor to the status of born-again redeemer.
At the end of the day, Daleks work best when single-minded and
merciless; if a little moral insightfulness is to be factored in at this stage
one hopes that it too comes at a price.
But two
weeks in and this ‘new’ ‘Doctor Who’ is showing every sign of living up to its
world tour led propaganda mission. We
have a Doctor who is trickier, less predictable and, possibly (when the
circumstances demand it), nastier than we’ve seen this century, and a show
which seems determined to jettison some of the frothier and less consequential
elements of the last few years. And in
Missy, making another cameo welcoming the recently deceased to ‘the promised
land’, possibly the most intriguing meme arc since the heady days of Bad Wolf
in 2005. Into the Dalek isn’t restrained
when examining the relationship between cause and effect, and it’s to be hoped
the rest of the season lives up to this premise. Dark days lie ahead, it seems…
It was better on rewatch though the tacked in Danny Pink at the start did grate a little. The ending was almost the opposite of RTD which I enjoyed. It would have improved with a cameo by a modern version of Beryl Reid, but you can't have everything :)
ReplyDelete